Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Young (entrepreneur)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Christian Young (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
News coverage is provided only by unreliable sources. None of the sources are intellectually independent. The Buzzfeed article is not by staff but a "Community Contributor". These types of articles can be purchased to create a semblance of news coverage. Outlets like timemail.in ("The Time Mail assures to bring to you the quality contents clubbed with the fearless journalism".)[1] will publish anything. Mduvekot (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a vanity page. --IndyNotes (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
I think this article is poorly written. If he is actually the president of FD9, there should be more information about him because FD9 is a known incubator. Also Coordinates collection had become part of a publicly listed company in a widely covered takeover. The author has failed to mention any of those sources. If any experienced editor can rework this to reduce the promotional content, it MAY help. I have removed a LOT of the fluff. Stripped it down to its bare minimum. Not sure if I vote keep (I am searching for more reliable sources) but it is not a strong delete as a "subject" but definitely poorly written.Drmaisel (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete delete based on sources, I'm not really finding the coverage we need. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.