Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evasive Action (film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 10:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Evasive Action (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. North America1000 10:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Vaco98 (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not every film that was commercially released is notable. We need to have substantial sources about the film to justify having an article. That is lacking.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find anything to establish that this ever received coverage that would establish notability. It exists and can be watched, but that's about it. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.